Saturday, November 29, 2008

Liberals Angry Over Obama Keeping Gates as Pentagon Chief

Click here for article

Obama promised the country change while he was campaigning. Most of his cabinet are former staffers of the Clinton administration. I think it shows the lack of experience on his part. -----Vickie

Liberals Angry Over Obama Keeping Gates as Pentagon Chief
President-elect Obama's expected selection of Robert Gates as his defense secretary and retired Gen. Jim Jones as his national security adviser is raising eyebrows among liberals.

More than a month before he takes the oath of office, President-elect Barack Obama already is testing the loyalty of his liberal base.

On Monday, he is expected to announce his national security team, which will include Robert Gates as his defense secretary, a carry-over from the Bush administration, and retired Gen. Jim Jones, who supported John McCain for president, as his national security adviser.

Liberal blogger Chris Bowers of The Open Left says the message sent by the selection of Gates undermines Democrats.

"The message would be clear," he writes in his blog. "Even Democrats agree that Democrats can't run the military."

Obama's outspoken opposition to the Iraq war before he became a U.S. senator was one of the reasons he was embraced early in the presidential race by the anti-war faction of the Democratic Party's base, so his apparent decision to keep a Bush adviser as defense secretary for at least a year has raised some eyebrows within that faction.

Bowers, a member of the Pennsylvania state Democratic committee, argues that Gates provided support and cover for practices from waterboarding to the use of psychotropic drugs on terror detainees. The blogger isn't as negative toward Jones but still called it "very disappointing."

"It is just so very frustrating," Bowers writes. "It seems like the only place progressives are making any gains is in the House. We are being entirely left out of Obama's major appointments so far. I guess everyone gets to play in Obama's administration, except progressives."

Democratic blogger Brent Budowsky, who served as a congressional assistant in the 1970s and 1980s, said he would have preferred to see Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska or former Democratic Sen. Sam Nunn of Georgia get the nod for defense secretary.

Budowsky said he fears that Obama's national security team will steer him toward a longer military commitment than the one he made on the campaign trail.

"It is unfortunate that on an issue so momentous as who runs the Pentagon at time of war, the views that were stated in the campaign, and supported so deeply by the base of the Democratic Party and the new voters and small donors who were the heart of the Obama campaign, are sacrificed so quickly, for Bob Gates," he writes in his blog.

GOP strategist Dave Winston told FOX News that some pushback was to be expected.

"The base is clearly going to say, where are you headed in terms of this policy?" Winston said. "And I think it will cause him some headaches with the base, although for the overall country, I think they will see it quite favorably."

Democratic consultant Bob Beckel told FOX News that objections from liberals over Obama's Cabinet selections isn't all bad.

"Not so sure, from Obama's standpoint, it's bad politically," he said. "It helps him in his negotiation with Congress."

Obama's national security team also will include several former members of Bill Clinton's administration, eliciting some complaints about recycling people from the Clinton White House. And Obama is expected to pick Hillary Clinton to be his pick for secretary of state.

But Beckel says Obama needs experience from the last Democratic White House.

"If he went to a Democratic administration before that, he'd have to go to the nursing home," he said.

FOX News' Wendell Goler contributed to this report.


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Fw: Bluetooth Gone Wrong

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1735 - Release Date: 10/20/08 2:52 PM


 
 
 
 
 



 

 
 
Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

FW: Best Airshow Recovery Ever

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1735 - Release Date: 10/20/08 2:52 PM


 


 

Is this for real?

 

 

OMG!!!   amazing, bet this guy changed his undies afterwards.

 

 


 
 
Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Fw: Beauty of Autumn

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1735 - Release Date: 10/20/08 2:52 PM


 
  


 
 
God's handiwork part 3



 
Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Fw: Sending you more Autumn..

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1735 - Release Date: 10/20/08 2:52 PM


 
 
Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Sarah Palin and David Letterman

Greta VanSustern on Fox News showed the tape of David Letterman talking about Sarah Palin. I didn’t think that it was right, and I kind of felt that Katie Couric didn’t think too much of it either. I got this email, so I thought that I would post it.

Do you think that he committed a violation of the FCC? What are your thoughts on this? ------Trickyvikki


Subject: On Team Sarah: Not funny, David!

A message to all members of Team Sarah

Such hypocrites!

Two nights ago, David Letterman, in interviewing Katie Couric, described Gov. Palin as “the first vice presidential candidate that I found myself being aroused about.”

It is ghastly that this kind of discourteous, indecent talk should pass for conversational fodder — even on late night TV.

This violates CBS’s own “Program Practices” specifically states that: “The Program Practices editors review material for excessive or gratuitous violence, sexuality, nudity and inappropriate language. They ensure that character portrayals are sensitive to current ethnic, religious, sexual and other significant social concerns.” http://www.cbspressexpress.com/div.php/cbs_network/page/program_practices

A violation? What do *you* think?

Well, don’t just think it! Make your voice heard.

Email the Federal Communications Commission!

Email fccinfo@fcc.gov, tell them your name, where you are from, and EXACTLY how you feel about Letterman taking indecent liberties with a dignified lady, mom, and governor on his show!

– Emily
teamsarah08@gmail.com

Visit Team Sarah at:http://www.teamsarah.org


To control which emails you receive on Team Sarah, go to:
http://www.teamsarah.org/profiles/profile/emailSettings

Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

My response to an article that I found last night

I found this article while surfing last night, and here is my response to it. The writer forgot to tell everyone that Jim Martin is outspending on ads by about three to one.
During the election, he ran more ads than Saxby Chambliss, and they were pretty nasty. He is running one now that probably took Saxby Chambliss out of context by saying he didn’t know what a recession was. He just runs that one sentence twice in his nasty ad.

He has been running ads about the bailout, which I feel he is being a hypocrite about. Barack Obama supported the bailout, as did John McCain. The reason that I call him a hypocrite, is because he is now running ads saying he backs Barack Obama completely, but yet he ran ads against Sen. Saxby Chambliss running him down for voting for the bailout when Obama supported it.

Although I hate what happened to his daughter, Saxby Chambliss isn’t running the ad. It is a 527 group doing it.

Obama is even running radio ads for Martin. So there is nastiness on both sides. ——Vickie

Freedom’s Watch attacks Democratic Senate candidate whose daughter was kidnapped as being soft on crime.
http://thinkprogress.org/ 2008/ 11/ 22/ chambliss-martin-crime/



Freedom’s Watch attacks Democratic Senate candidate whose daughter was kidnapped as being soft on crime. By Amanda Terkel at 6:40 pm Freedom’s Watch attacks Democratic Senate candidate whose daughter was kidnapped as being soft on crime.» Yesterday, the struggling Freedom’s Watch released an attack ad against Georgia’s Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Jim Martin, saying that he “failed to look out for Georgia’s families.” “First he actually helped block stiffer penalties for drunk drivers,” warns the voice in the ad, which echoes previous GOP ads.

17 hours ago
Tagged:

chambliss,
crime,
martin,
think fast
Think Progress » Home Page
http://thinkprogress.org
view larger thumbnail

Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

How Obama got elected




Just think, these people canceled out your votes. Kind of makes you sick, doesn't it?======Trickyvikki
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

From top rival to top aide: The Clinton-Obama detente

Click here for article

I have heard some speculation about why Obama would want Hillary Clinton out of the Senate. The speculation was she was block his health-care plans, and he wanted her out of the way.

Now, Obama will be her boss. I wonder who will boss who?-------Trickyvikki

From top rival to top aide: The Clinton-Obama detente
By Elisabeth Bumiller


New York Times

Posted: 11/22/2008 05:50:21 PM PST


WASHINGTON — The thaw in the resentful relationship between the most powerful woman in the Democratic party and her younger male rival began at the party's convention this summer, when Sen. Hillary Clinton gave such a passionate speech supporting Sen. Barack Obama that his top aides leapt out of their chairs backstage to give her a standing ovation as she swept past.

Strategic move

Obama, who was in the first steps of what would become a strategic courtship, called afterward to thank her. By then, close aides to Clinton said, she had come to respect the campaign Obama had run against her. At the least, she knew he understood like no one else the brutal strains of their epic primary battle.

By Thursday, when Obama reassured Clinton that as secretary of state she would have direct access to him and could select her own staff, the wooing was complete.

"She feels like she's been treated very well in the way she's been asked," said a close associate of Clinton, who like others asked for anonymity because the nomination won't be formally announced until after Thanksgiving.

Few are predicting this new relationship born of mutual respect and self-interest will grow into a tight bond between the new president and the woman who will be the public face of his foreign policy, though some say it is not impossible. They argue that a close friendship between the two powerful officials is useful but not essential, and isn't a predictor of the success of the nation's top diplomat.

Intellectual bond

While James Baker was extraordinarily close to President George H.W. Bush and is widely considered one of the most successful recent secretaries of state, Dean Acheson was not a friend of President Harry Truman, and Henry Kissinger did not particularly like President Richard Nixon.

"Two of the nation's greatest secretaries of state in the modern period, Dean Acheson and Henry Kissinger, were not personally close but were intellectually bonded to their presidents," said Walter Isaacson, the author of a biography of Kissinger and the co-author, with Evan Thomas, of "The Wise Men," a book about America's postwar foreign policy establishment. "I think that Obama and Clinton could form a perfect partnership based on respect for each other's view of the world."

In the Obama-Clinton relationship, advisers say, the relatively smooth nature of their talks about the secretary of state job indicate that both, for now, have a working chemistry.


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

U.S. Kills Al-Qaeda Suspect

Click here for article
U.S. Kills Al-Qaeda Suspect
Strike in Pakistan Claims Fugitive Tied to '06 Airline Bomb Plot
By Candace Rondeaux
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, November 23, 2008; Page A14

KABUL, Afghanistan, Nov. 22 -- A suspected al-Qaeda operative linked to a 2006 plot to blow up British airliners was killed Saturday in a suspected U.S. missile strike in northwestern Pakistan, according to two Pakistani intelligence officials. At least four other extremist fighters were also killed.

The officials said the al-Qaeda suspect was Rashid Rauf, a man who held dual Pakistani and British citizenship. The attack came from an unmanned U.S. Predator aircraft, which fired at least two Hellfire missiles at a suspected Taliban compound in the village of Ali Khel in the restive tribal area of North Waziristan, said the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly about missile strikes.

The dead also included at least three foreign fighters, the officials said.

Rauf, a former resident of the British city of Birmingham, was suspected to be the ringleader in an alleged al-Qaeda plot to blow up commercial jetliners flying from Britain to the United States. He was arrested by Pakistani authorities in Bahawalpur in August 2006 after British officials learned of the alleged terrorist operation, which authorities said included a plan to smuggle liquid explosives and camera flash detonators on board at least 10 airplanes. The plot led to widespread restrictions on items travelers could carry onto planes.

In London, a Foreign Office spokesman said British officials were investigating reports that Rauf had been killed but could not confirm his death.


Before his arrest, Rauf's alleged ties to the Pakistani terrorist group Jaish-i-Muhammad stirred strong suspicions among intelligence experts that he also might have had connections with rogue elements in Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate, also known as the ISI. Jaish-i-Muhammad, banned in Pakistan, has played a leading role in an ISI-supported proxy war with India over the disputed northern territory of Kashmir. The group is widely suspected to be behind the abduction and killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002.

Rauf's association with the group is thought to have begun around the time he married a close relative of the group's founder, Maulana Masood Azhar.

A Pakistani court dropped terrorism charges against Rauf in late 2006. Pakistani authorities, nonetheless, offered to extradite him to Britain in connection with the airliner plot. But suspicions about his connections to Pakistani intelligence agencies deepened after he escaped from custody last December. Pakistani security officials said Rauf slipped out of his handcuffs after police allowed him to stop at a mosque in the capital, Islamabad.

Rauf's attorney at the time, Hashmat Habib, said Rauf was subsequently taken into ISI custody. Until Saturday's strike in North Waziristan, Rauf's whereabouts were not publicly known.

Habib, reached at his offices in Pakistan, said he was aware of the reports but could not confirm whether Rauf had been killed.

The U.S. military has stepped up a campaign this year targeting al-Qaeda and Taliban havens along Pakistan's mountainous border with Afghanistan. Military officials say the surge in activity has had a debilitating effect on militant operations in the region.

But the attacks have drawn criticism from Pakistan's top military officer, Gen. Ashfaq Kiyani. Kiyani, who formerly led the ISI, and other top Pakistani officials have said collateral damage and civilian deaths from the missile strikes could increase anti-American sentiment in Pakistan, a key ally in the U.S.-led war against Islamist insurgents in Afghanistan.

Special correspondent Shaiq Hussain in Islamabad, Pakistan, contributed to this report.


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Message from The National Republican Trust

If you could help them out in any way, it would really be appreciated. ;)
GOPTrust.com

Message from The National Republican Trust PAC
From Scott Wheeler




Dear Supporter:D-Day has begun.

With your help and the help of almost 50,000 other Americans, we at the National Republican Trust PAC — also known as GOPtrust.com — have begun our TV assault in Georgia against Barack Obama and the left-wing Democrats who want total control over Congress.

Our new TV ad has begun to run across Georgia exposing Obama’s plans.

As you know, Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss is fighting to keep his Georgia seat in GOP hands.

It is critical he does so. Chambliss will be the key Senate vote in stopping Obama’s radical agenda.

But Sen. Chambliss faces an incredibly stiff challenge from his opponent Jim Martin.

Just last week Obama, Chuck Schumer and Washington Democrats poured almost $1 million into the state to defeat him.

They are bussing in thousands of “organizers” to snatch this election from the GOP.

This is why our campaign is so vitally important.

Fox News analyst Dick Morris says this election is vitally important to all of us across the country.

Morris says if Obama wins the Georgia seat, he will ram through Congress a radical agenda on taxes, guns, abortion — he can even shut down talk radio!

Dick Morris says we at the National Republican Trust PAC “are leading the fight to save Chambliss and keep Obama from getting a filibuster-proof Senate.”

Dick says this won’t be easy for Chambliss because the Obama camp has more money and they are experts at voter turn-out — the key to winning this race.

But Dick says we can still defeat Martin and Obama.

We need your help today to do it!

Please donate to our cause by Going Here Now.

See our new TV ad exposing Obama and Martin — Go Here Now.

Thank you.

Scott Wheeler
Executive Director

P.S. We now have about one week before the December 2nd run-off election. We can leave nothing to chance. We need to raise millions to stop Obama. Please help us today by calling our Donor Hotline at 1-866-957-1467 or Go Here Now.

Paid for by The National Republican Trust PAC.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
2100 M St. NW Suite 170-340 Washington, DC 20037-1233
Contributions to The National Republican Trust PAC are not
deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.
No corporate funds are accepted.




Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Friday, November 21, 2008

Roger Ailes on FNC's 'Obligation' to Not Derail Obama Transition

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2008/11/21/roger-ailes-fncs-obligation-not-derail-obama-transition

This is nonsense. Fox has been the best cable news out of all of the rest. I just hope that the staff doesn't heed what Roger Ailes told them. I have noticed that some of them have stopped talking about Obama. They don't need to stop because they started in on GWB the day he got nominated and have only recently let up on him.

Roger Ailes on FNC's 'Obligation' to Not Derail Obama Transition
By Ken Shepherd (Bio | Archive)
November 21, 2008 - 12:36 ET

News Corporation executive Roger Ailes has told Los Angeles Times reporter Matea Gold that he has advised employees of the Fox News Channel that "all presidents deserve time to get their team on the ground and get organized" and that "we have some obligation in a new presidency not to attempt to destabilize it."

Via TVNewser (paragraph breaks removed):

Ailes responded to the report in the New York Daily News that he instructed FNC to tone down attacks on President-elect Barack Obama. He denied giving specific orders, but said he told staffers "all presidents deserve time to get their team on the ground and get organized." "We have some obligation in a new presidency not to attempt to destabilize it," he said. As for whether the big stars will heed the advice, he tells Gold: "Who knows? Most of them do whatever the hell they want."


What say you, reader? Is Ailes right to urge his staffers to not go full throttle at the Obama transition? Does his advice adhere to the "fair and balanced" motto or risk sending a pro-Obama message? If it is "fair and balanced," is that good journalism or a poor business model given the outright left-wing boosterism other networks, particularly MSNBC, have shown team Obama?


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Was the Mainstream Media fair and balanced on the election?

You decide. Look at these links.


http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/03/cable-news-ratings-for-october-31/7471

http://www.journalism.org/node/13436
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Thursday, November 20, 2008

How Obama got elected

Check out this site. It will make you sick to think that these people voted and canceled out your votes. howobamagotelected.com/
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Monday, November 17, 2008

Second Update: Open Letter to Mr. Obama

http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/Update/Update2008-11-12.htm

This site is taking up money to: "We are in the process of raising $90,000 to pay for the publication of the Open Letter and a room at the National Press Club to publicly discuss any response by Mr. Obama."


In our two prior articles we discussed our intention to publish a full-page open letter to President-Elect Obama in USA TODAY. In effect, the open letter would be a Petition for Redress of a violation of the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution (Article II, Section 1).

The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees a citizen’s Right to Petition officials of the Government for Redress (i.e., for a Remedy) of alleged violations of the Constitution. Inherent in the Right to Redress is the citizen’s Right to a response.

We are in the process of raising $90,000 to pay for the publication of the Open Letter and a room at the National Press Club to publicly discuss any response by Mr. Obama.

Time is of the essence. We would like to publish the open letter next week and hold the press conference at the National Press club one week later, in advance of the dates when the Electoral College’s state electors are certified cast their votes. If Mr. Obama is not able to prove his eligibility, the electors will have to cast their votes for someone else for it would be treason to the Constitution to cast their votes for a usurper.

The purpose of this update is twofold: (1) to provide the updated total of the funds received to date; and (2), to review some of the evidence.

Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Obama's Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html

I found this interesting. Go to that site and see the form they have.

November 13, 2008
EXCLUSIVE: Did Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama's Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions
Printer Friendly

By Debbie Schlussel

**** Copyright 2008, Must Cite Debbie Schlussel and link to DebbieSchlussel.com ****

*** SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATES ***

Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?

It's either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama's official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.

But the release of Obama's draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama's claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

The Night We Waved Goodbye to America (Peter Hitchens)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1084111/PETER-HITCHENS-The-night-waved-goodbye-America--best-hope-Earth.html

The Night We Waved Goodbye to America (Peter Hitchens)

By Peter Hitchens, Daily Mail, UK:

Anyone would think we had just elected a hip, skinny and youthful replacement for God, with a plan to modernise Heaven and Hell - or that at the very least John Lennon had come back from the dead.

The swooning frenzy over the choice of Barack Obama as President of the United States must be one of the most absurd waves of self-deception and swirling fantasy ever to sweep through an advanced civilisation. At least Mandela-worship - its nearest equivalent - is focused on a man who actually did something.

I really don’t see how the Obama devotees can ever in future mock the Moonies, the Scientologists or people who claim to have been abducted in flying saucers. This is a cult like the one which grew up around Princess Diana, bereft of reason and hostile to facts.

It already has all the signs of such a thing. The newspapers which recorded Obama’s victory have become valuable relics. You may buy Obama picture books and Obama calendars and if there isn’t yet a children’s picture version of his story, there soon will be.

Proper books, recording his sordid associates, his cowardly voting record, his astonishingly militant commitment to unrestricted abortion and his blundering trip to Africa, are little-read and hard to find.

If you can believe that this undistinguished and conventionally Left-wing machine politician is a sort of secular saviour, then you can believe anything. He plainly doesn’t believe it himself. His cliche-stuffed, PC clunker of an acceptance speech suffered badly from nerves. It was what you would expect from someone who knew he’d promised too much and that from now on the easy bit was over.

He needn’t worry too much. From now on, the rough boys and girls of America’s Democratic Party apparatus, many recycled from Bill Clinton’s stained and crumpled entourage, will crowd round him, to collect the rich spoils of his victory and also tell him what to do, which is what he is used to.

Just look at his sermon by the shores of Lake Michigan. He really did talk about a ‘new dawn’, and a ‘timeless creed’ (which was ‘yes, we can’). He proclaimed that ‘change has come’. He revealed that, despite having edited the Harvard Law Review, he doesn’t know what ‘enormity’ means. He reached depths of oratorical drivel never even plumbed by our own Mr Blair, burbling about putting our hands on the arc of history (or was it the ark of history?) and bending it once more toward the hope of a better day (Don’t try this at home).

I am not making this up. No wonder that awful old hack Jesse Jackson sobbed as he watched. How he must wish he, too, could get away with this sort of stuff.

And it was interesting how the President-elect failed to lift his admiring audience by repeated - but rather hesitant - invocations of the brainless slogan he was forced by his minders to adopt against his will - ‘Yes, we can’. They were supposed to thunder ‘Yes, we can!’ back at him, but they just wouldn’t join in. No wonder. Yes we can what exactly? Go home and keep a close eye on the tax rate, is my advice. He’d have been better off bursting into ‘I’d like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony’ which contains roughly the same message and might have attracted some valuable commercial sponsorship.

Perhaps, being a Chicago crowd, they knew some of the things that 52.5 per cent of America prefers not to know. They know Obama is the obedient servant of one of the most squalid and unshakeable political machines in America. They know that one of his alarmingly close associates, a state-subsidised slum landlord called Tony Rezko, has been convicted on fraud and corruption charges.

They also know the US is just as segregated as it was before Martin Luther King - in schools, streets, neighbourhoods, holidays, even in its TV-watching habits and its choice of fast-food joint. The difference is that it is now done by unspoken agreement rather than by law.

If Mr Obama’s election had threatened any of that, his feel-good white supporters would have scuttled off and voted for John McCain, or practically anyone. But it doesn’t. Mr Obama, thanks mainly to the now-departed grandmother he alternately praised as a saint and denounced as a racial bigot, has the huge advantages of an expensive private education. He did not have to grow up in the badlands of useless schools, shattered families and gangs which are the lot of so many young black men of his generation.

If the nonsensical claims made for this election were true, then every positive discrimination programme aimed at helping black people into jobs they otherwise wouldn’t get should be abandoned forthwith. Nothing of the kind will happen. On the contrary, there will probably be more of them.

And if those who voted for Obama were all proving their anti-racist nobility, that presumably means that those many millions who didn’t vote for him were proving themselves to be hopeless bigots. This is obviously untrue.

Yes we can what?: Barack Obama ran on the ticket of change

I was in Washington DC the night of the election. America’s beautiful capital has a sad secret. It is perhaps the most racially divided city in the world, with 15th Street - which runs due north from the White House - the unofficial frontier between black and white. But, like so much of America, it also now has a new division, and one which is in many ways much more important. I had attended an election-night party in a smart and liberal white area, but was staying the night less than a mile away on the edge of a suburb where Spanish is spoken as much as English, plus a smattering of tongues from such places as Ethiopia, Somalia and Afghanistan.

As I walked, I crossed another of Washington’s secret frontiers. There had been a few white people blowing car horns and shouting, as the result became clear. But among the Mexicans, Salvadorans and the other Third World nationalities, there was something like ecstasy.

They grasped the real significance of this moment. They knew it meant that America had finally switched sides in a global cultural war. Forget the Cold War, or even the Iraq War. The United States, having for the most part a deeply conservative people, had until now just about stood out against many of the mistakes which have ruined so much of the rest of the world.

Suspicious of welfare addiction, feeble justice and high taxes, totally committed to preserving its own national sovereignty, unabashedly Christian in a world part secular and part Muslim, suspicious of the Great Global Warming panic, it was unique.

These strengths had been fading for some time, mainly due to poorly controlled mass immigration and to the march of political correctness. They had also been weakened by the failure of America’s conservative party - the Republicans - to fight on the cultural and moral fronts.

They preferred to posture on the world stage. Scared of confronting Left-wing teachers and sexual revolutionaries at home, they could order soldiers to be brave on their behalf in far-off deserts. And now the US, like Britain before it, has begun the long slow descent into the Third World. How sad. Where now is our last best hope on Earth?

Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Hillary Clinton and John McCain-Please say no!!!!!!

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/11/former_foes_on.html

The reason I want them to say no, is because we need those two in the senate. If Obama goes too far, I believe they will stand up to him. If they take positions, they will only be there for 4 or 8 years.

I am also wondering if McCain's meeting with Obama has something to do with his Senate resolution that he got because of his birth in Panana. Maybe Barack Obama wants the favor returned?

There is a case of a suit on Obama that is in the Supreme Court right now. The Justice is Clarence Thomas. Defano is fighting for a stay on the electorial votes going to Obama, on the grounds that Obama is not a "natural born citizen".

Former Foes on Obama's Radar

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor November 17, 2008 10:19 AM
Today for President-elect Barack Obama is all about his former rivals.

For the first time since his historic victory, Obama meets in Chicago with his Republican opponent John McCain. Obama's designated White House chief of staff, Representative Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, and one of McCain's closest confidantes, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina will also be in the room.

"It's well known that they share an important belief that Americans want and deserve a more effective and efficient government, and will discuss ways to work together to make that a reality," the Obama transition office said in a statement.

But there has also been rumors that Obama might even tap his former foe for a Cabinet post, though that seems highly unlikely.

More likely is that Senator Hillary Clinton, who battled Obama for the Democratic nomination for more than a year, might actually become his secretary of state. Speculation has been swirling since their private meeting last week that Clinton might want to leave the Senate and be Obama's point person to -- as they both vowed during the campaign -- restore America's standing in the world.

But with the economy in a nose-dive, a new poll out this morning found that the selection of secretary of state is far less important to Americans than the next treasury secretary.

The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey asked which position would matter most to the country's future: the Secretary of State, who oversees foreign policy; Secretary of Defense, who oversees military policy; or Secretary of the Treasury, who oversees economic policy.

The reply: 41 percent picked treasury secretary, 25 percent secretary of state, and 24 percent defense secretary. Also, 77 percent of respondents said they were very confident or somewhat confident that Obama would make the right decisions in selecting his cabinet.


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

GOPtrust.com

Message from The National Republican Trust PAC
From Scott Wheeler


Saxby Chambliss Needs Your Help.

He Can Stop Obama.

Democrats Pour Millions into Georgia.

Dear Supporter:

Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss is in real trouble in his Georgia run-off.

Right now he is the one vote that stands between Barack Obama getting the 60 votes in the Senate he needs to end Republican filibusters.

With 60 Democratic votes in the Senate, Obama will be able to pass radical tax increases, give 12 millions illegals citizenship, pass a sweeping abortion law and limit gun rights.

He must be stopped. Saxby Chambliss is trying to do just that.

I am writing you today to warn you that the Democrats and Barack Obama are very close to gaining total control of the U.S. Congress.

With a huge majority in the Pelosi-led House and at least 57 votes in the U.S. Senate, Obama is so close. And Senate races in Alaska and Minnesota have yet to be decided.

Several liberal Republicans may even help the Democrats in the Senate.

This is why Chambliss' vote is absolutely critical for the Republicans in the Senate to block Obama's radical plans.

But, after a terrible defeat at the national polls last election day, Republicans just don't have the money they need to fight in Georgia.

The New York Times reported that Chambliss has raised just $1 million for his run-off election, now set for Dec. 2nd.

Meanwhile the Democrats have already spent almost as much $1 million in just the past week attacking Chambliss. That's almost a million in one week!

The Times revealed that "analysts say Democrats now have a clear fund-raising advantage" over Chambliss.

We urgently need your help to defend Chambliss — Go Here Now.

The Democrats also have a huge organizational advantage.

Obama has dispatched his campaign's top "organizers" to Georgia. Thousands of liberal, pro-gay, anti-gun, pro-abortion, pro-union and other activists are swooping into Georgia as we speak.

The liberals all know the key to winning George will be getting out the vote.

Dick Morris: GOPtrust Can Stop Obama

We at the National Republican Trust PAC, also known as GOPtrust.com, have joined the fight to stop Obama in Georgia.

We have already raised $500,000 for TV ads that will begin airing this coming week in Georgia.

We have an ambitious goal: raise $5 million in just 2 weeks to stop Obama in Georgia and expose his radical agenda to its voters.

The Democratic Senate candidate Jim Martin has already promised he will be a rubber stamp for Obama once he gets into the Senate. We need to let the people of Georgia know this.

Remember, we at the National Republican Trust PAC are not only battling Martin and the Democrats, but the liberal media who worked so hard to get Obama elected.

They now want a pro-Obama Senate to push down your throat their radical legislative agenda.

But you can stop them in Georgia.

You can do it by helping the National Republican Trust PAC by donating to us — Go Here Now.

Al Gore Puts Nose into Georgia Race

Al Gore just sent out an email to Democrat activitists saying Georgia was crucial to their liberal agenda and giving Obama a "filibuster-proof" Senate.

Gore has a radical global warming agenda he and Obama want to ram through Congress.

But if Chambliss wins, they won't get their way.

You can stop Al Gore by Going Here Now.

We desperately need to plan our TV ad war on Obama and Democrat Martin.

You can help us by donating to our media war chest.

Fox News analyst Dick Morris says "The National Republican Trust PAC can make a huge difference in Georgia. It has taken the lead role in defending the country from total liberal control of the Senate."

Dick is right. We are taking the lead role.

But we need your help today. Urgently.

Please help us by Going Here Now.

The maximum donation is $5000. It sounds like a lot.

But it is small when you consider what you will save in taxes over the next five years when you stop Obama's radical tax increases in the Senate.

It is small when you consider you will stop his planned cuts in our Defense Department.

It is small when you consider Al Gore won't be able to put you and me back into the Stone Age with his global warming plans.

It is small when you consider Obama won't get anti-gun and pro-abortion laws passed.

Even a donation of $2500 or $1000 can make a huge difference in Georgia and helping our cause.

But we need to start buying ads now.

Please help us at this critical moment — Go Here Now.

Thank you and God bless our country.

Yours for America,

Scott Wheeler
Executive Director

P.S. The New York Times reports that Obama will likely avoid campaigning for Democrat Martin in Georgia. Why? Because they are afraid Georgia voters will make the connection between Democrat Martin and Obama's radical agenda. The Democrats know Georgia voters don't want Obama and Pelosi running the country. This is why our strategy is so crucial in Georgia. We want to expose Obama and Pelosi. We need your help to do it — call our Donor Hotline today at 1-866-957-1467 or Go Here Now.

Paid for by The National Republican Trust PAC.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
2100 M St. NW Suite 170-340 Washington, DC 20037-1233




Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Obama’s Communist Mentor

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-communist-mentor/

Check out this article. Obama only refers to this guy as "Frank" in his book. Why didn't the media report on this? I know of only one who did. Sean Hannity at Fox News did report on it. What is wrong with the mainstream media in this country?

Obama’s Communist Mentor


AIM Column | By Cliff Kincaid | February 18, 2008

Is “coalition politics” at work in Obama’s rise to power?

In his biography of Barack Obama, David Mendell writes about Obama's life as a "secret smoker" and how he "went to great lengths to conceal the habit." But what about Obama's secret political life? It turns out that Obama's childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a communist.

In his books, Obama admits attending "socialist conferences" and coming into contact with Marxist literature. But he ridicules the charge of being a "hard-core academic Marxist," which was made by his colorful and outspoken 2004 U.S. Senate opponent, Republican Alan Keyes.

However, through Frank Marshall Davis, Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son, with Davis, listening to his "poetry" and getting advice on his career path. But Obama, in his book, Dreams From My Father, refers to him repeatedly as just "Frank."

The reason is apparent: Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. In fact, the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. What's more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations.

Trevor Loudon, a New Zealand-based libertarian activist, researcher and blogger, noted evidence that "Frank" was Frank Marshall Davis in a posting in March of 2007.

Obama's communist connection adds to mounting public concern about a candidate who has come out of virtually nowhere, with a brief U.S. Senate legislative record, to become the Democratic Party frontrunner for the U.S. presidency. In the latest Real Clear Politics poll average, Obama beats Republican John McCain by almost four percentage points.

AIM recently disclosed that Obama has well-documented socialist connections, which help explain why he sponsored a "Global Poverty Act" designed to send hundreds of billions of dollars of U.S. foreign aid to the rest of the world, in order to meet U.N. demands. The bill has passed the House and a Senate committee, and awaits full Senate action.

But the Communist Party connection through Davis is even more ominous. Decades ago, the CPUSA had tens of thousands of members, some of them covert agents who had penetrated the U.S. Government. It received secret subsidies from the old Soviet Union.

You won't find any of this discussed in the David Mendell book, Obama: From Promise to Power. It is typical of the superficial biographies of Obama now on the market. Secret smoking seems to be Obama's most controversial activity. At best, Mendell and the liberal media describe Obama as "left-leaning."

But you will find it briefly discussed, sort of, in Obama's own book, Dreams From My Father. He writes about "a poet named Frank," who visited them in Hawaii, read poetry, and was full of "hard-earned knowledge" and advice. Who was Frank? Obama only says that he had "some modest notoriety once," was "a contemporary of Richard Wright and Langston Hughes during his years in Chicago..." but was now "pushing eighty." He writes about "Frank and his old Black Power dashiki self" giving him advice before he left for Occidental College in 1979 at the age of 18.

This "Frank" is none other than Frank Marshall Davis, the black communist writer now considered by some to be in the same category of prominence as Maya Angelou and Alice Walker. In the summer/fall 2003 issue of African American Review, James A. Miller of George Washington University reviews a book by John Edgar Tidwell, a professor at the University of Kansas, about Davis's career, and notes, "In Davis's case, his political commitments led him to join the American Communist Party during the middle of World War II-even though he never publicly admitted his Party membership." Tidwell is an expert on the life and writings of Davis.

Is it possible that Obama did not know who Davis was when he wrote his book, Dreams From My Father, first published in 1995? That's not plausible since Obama refers to him as a contemporary of Richard Wright and Langston Hughes and says he saw a book of his black poetry.

The communists knew who "Frank" was, and they know who Obama is. In fact, one academic who travels in communist circles understands the significance of the Davis-Obama relationship.

Professor Gerald Horne, a contributing editor of the Communist Party journal Political Affairs, talked about it during a speech last March at the reception of the Communist Party USA archives at the Tamiment Library at New York University. The remarks are posted online under the headline, "Rethinking the History and Future of the Communist Party."

Horne, a history professor at the University of Houston, noted that Davis, who moved to Honolulu from Kansas in 1948 "at the suggestion of his good friend Paul Robeson," came into contact with Barack Obama and his family and became the young man's mentor, influencing Obama's sense of identity and career moves. Robeson, of course, was the well-known black actor and singer who served as a member of the CPUSA and apologist for the old Soviet Union. Davis had known Robeson from his time in Chicago.

As Horne describes it, Davis "befriended" a "Euro-American family" that had "migrated to Honolulu from Kansas and a young woman from this family eventually had a child with a young student from Kenya East Africa who goes by the name of Barack Obama, who retracing the steps of Davis eventually decamped to Chicago."

It was in Chicago that Obama became a "community organizer" and came into contact with more far-left political forces, including the Democratic Socialists of America, which maintains close ties to European socialist groups and parties through the Socialist International (SI), and two former members of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), William Ayers and Carl Davidson.

The SDS laid siege to college campuses across America in the 1960s, mostly in order to protest the Vietnam War, and spawned the terrorist Weather Underground organization. Ayers was a member of the terrorist group and turned himself in to authorities in 1981. He is now a college professor and served with Obama on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago. Davidson is now a figure in the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, an offshoot of the old Moscow-controlled CPUSA, and helped organize the 2002 rally where Obama came out against the Iraq War.

Both communism and socialism trace their roots to Karl Marx, co-author of the Communist Manifesto, who endorsed the first meeting of the Socialist International, then called the "First International." According to Pierre Mauroy, president of the SI from 1992-1996, "It was he [Marx] who formally launched it, gave the inaugural address and devised its structure..."

Apparently unaware that Davis had been publicly named as a CPUSA member, Horne said only that Davis "was certainly in the orbit of the CP [Communist Party]-if not a member..."

In addition to Tidwell's book, Black Moods: Collected Poems of Frank Marshall Davis, confirming Davis's Communist Party membership, another book, The New Red Negro: The Literary Left and African American Poetry, 1930-1946, names Davis as one of several black poets who continued to publish in CPUSA-supported publications after the 1939 Hitler-Stalin non-aggression pact. The author, James Edward Smethurst, associate professor of Afro-American studies at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, says that Davis, however, would later claim that he was "deeply troubled" by the pact.

While blacks such as Richard Wright left the CPUSA, it is not clear if or when Davis ever left the party.

However, Obama writes in Dreams From My Father that he saw "Frank" only a few days before he left Hawaii for college, and that Davis seemed just as radical as ever. Davis called college "An advanced degree in compromise" and warned Obama not to forget his "people" and not to "start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that ####." Davis also complained about foot problems, the result of "trying to force African feet into European shoes," Obama wrote.

For his part, Horne says that Obama's giving of credit to Davis will be important in history. "At some point in the future, a teacher will add to her syllabus Barack's memoir and instruct her students to read it alongside Frank Marshall Davis' equally affecting memoir, Living the Blues and when that day comes, I'm sure a future student will not only examine critically the Frankenstein monsters that US imperialism created in order to subdue Communist parties but will also be moved to come to this historic and wonderful archive in order to gain insight on what has befallen this complex and intriguing planet on which we reside," he said.

Dr. Kathryn Takara, a professor of Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of Hawaii at Manoa who also confirms that Davis is the "Frank" in Obama's book, did her dissertation on Davis and spent much time with him between 1972 until he passed away in 1987.

In an analysis posted online, she notes that Davis, who was a columnist for the Honolulu Record, brought "an acute sense of race relations and class struggle throughout America and the world" and that he openly discussed subjects such as American imperialism, colonialism and exploitation. She described him as a "socialist realist" who attacked the work of the House Un-American Activities Committee.

Davis, in his own writings, had said that Robeson and Harry Bridges, the head of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) and a secret member of the CPUSA, had suggested that he take a job as a columnist with the Honolulu Record "and see if I could do something for them." The ILWU was organizing workers there and Robeson's contacts were "passed on" to Davis, Takara writes.

Takara says that Davis "espoused freedom, radicalism, solidarity, labor unions, due process, peace, affirmative action, civil rights, Negro History week, and true Democracy to fight imperialism, colonialism, and white supremacy. He urged coalition politics."

Is "coalition politics" at work in Obama's rise to power?

Trevor Loudon, the New Zealand-based blogger who has been analyzing the political forces behind Obama and specializes in studying the impact of Marxist and leftist political organizations, notes that Frank Chapman, a CPUSA supporter, has written a letter to the party newspaper hailing the Illinois senator's victory in the Iowa caucuses.

"Obama's victory was more than a progressive move; it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle," Chapman wrote. "Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary ‘mole,' not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through."

Let's challenge the liberal media to report on this. Will they have the honesty and integrity to do so?


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Check this out-does this sound like Obama's campaign to you?

http://www.semcosh.org/AlinskyTactics.htm

Is it me, or did Obama follow these rules during his campaign for President?

From Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky

Printable version

Tactics mean doing what you can with what you have.

Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. In the world of give and take, tactics is the art of how to take and how to give. Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.

For an elementary illustration of tactics, take parts of your face as the point of reference; your eyes, your ears, and your nose. First the eyes; if you have organized a vast, mass-based people's organization, you can parade it visibly before the enemy and openly show your power. Second the ears; if your organization is small in numbers, then...conceal the members in the dark but raise a din and clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more than it does. Third, the nose; if your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place.

Always remember the first rule of power tactics: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.

Second: Never go outside the experience of your people. When an action is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

The fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.

The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.

Sixth rule: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.

A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment.

Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.

The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.

The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.

If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative.

The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. You cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his suddenly agreeing with your demand and saying "You're right - we don't know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us."

Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

In conflict tactics there are certain rules that the organizer should always regard as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and "frozen." By this I mean that in a complex, interrelated, urban society, it becomes increasingly difficult to single out who is to blame for any particular evil. There is a constant, and somewhat legitimate, passing of the buck. The target is always trying to shift responsibility to get out of being the target.

One of the criteria in picking your target is the target's vulnerability - where do you have the power to start? Furthermore, the target can always say, "Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?" When you "freeze the target," you disregard these arguments and, for the moment, all others to blame.

Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all of the "others" come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target.

The other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a personification, not something general and abstract such as a community's segregated practices or a major corporation or City Hall. It is not possible to develop the necessary hostility against, say, City Hall, which after all is a concrete, physical, inanimate structure, or against a corporation, which has no soul or identity, or a public school administration, which again is an inanimate system.



More from Alinsky:

Alinsky laid out a set of basic principles to guide the actions and decisions of radical organizers [community organizers] and the People’s Organizations they established. The organizer, he said, ‘must first rub raw the resentments of the people; fan the latent hostilities to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act.’ The organizer’s function, he added, was ‘to agitate to the point of conflict ’and ‘to maneuver and bait the establishment so that it will publicly attack him as a “dangerous enemy.” ‘The word ‘enemy,’ said Alinsky, ‘is sufficient to put the organizer on the side of the people’; i.e., to convince members of the community that he is so eager to advocate on their behalf, that he has willingly opened himself up to condemnation and derision.


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Check this out

While I was signing the petition to stop the Fairness Doctrine, I found this link. This site is pretty cool.

http://dontgomovement.com/

They got started off of Twitter. The House Republicans kept asking the Democrats to stay in session so energy bills could be passed. They didn't listen, until two of them started posting #dontgo on Twitter. Then others became involved in the movement.
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Fairness Doctrine

http://www.protectfairness.com/?p=5

They have a petition to stop the Fairness Doctrine the Democrats want to do. If this is passed, all conservative talk radio will go off the air. The united Republican Fund is doing the petition.
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Obama election spurs race crimes around country

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iEyLuiVkdd-f1RM5wnoR0kF4WbvgD94FQJKG0
By JESSE WASHINGTON – 2 hours ago

Cross burnings. Schoolchildren chanting "Assassinate Obama." Black figures hung from nooses. Racial epithets scrawled on homes and cars.

Incidents around the country referring to President-elect Barack Obama are dampening the postelection glow of racial progress and harmony, highlighting the stubborn racism that remains in America.

From California to Maine, police have documented a range of alleged crimes, from vandalism and vague threats to at least one physical attack. Insults and taunts have been delivered by adults, college students and second-graders.

There have been "hundreds" of incidents since the election, many more than usual, said Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Project at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate crimes.

One was in Snellville, Ga., where Denene Millner said a boy on the school bus told her 9-year-old daughter the day after the election: "I hope Obama gets assassinated." That night, someone trashed her sister-in-law's front lawn, mangled the Obama lawn signs, and left two pizza boxes filled with human feces outside the front door, Millner said.

She described her emotions as a combination of anger and fear.

"I can't say that every white person in Snellville is evil and anti-Obama and willing to desecrate my property because one or two idiots did it," said Millner, who is black. "But it definitely makes you look a little different at the people who you live with, and makes you wonder what they're capable of and what they're really thinking."

Potok, who is white, said he believes there is "a large subset of white people in this country who feel that they are losing everything they know, that the country their forefathers built has somehow been stolen from them."

Grant Griffin, a 46-year-old white Georgia native, expressed similar sentiments: "I believe our nation is ruined and has been for several decades and the election of Obama is merely the culmination of the change.

"If you had real change it would involve all the members of (Obama's) church being deported," he said.

Change in whatever form does not come easy, and a black president is "the most profound change in the field of race this country has experienced since the Civil War," said William Ferris, senior associate director of the Center for the Study of the American South at the University of North Carolina. "It's shaking the foundations on which the country has existed for centuries."

"Someone once said racism is like cancer," Ferris said. "It's never totally wiped out, it's in remission."

If so, America's remission lasted until the morning of Nov. 5.

The day after the vote hailed as a sign of a nation changed, black high school student Barbara Tyler of Marietta, Ga., said she heard hateful Obama comments from white students, and that teachers cut off discussion about Obama's victory.

Tyler spoke at a press conference by the Georgia chapter of the NAACP calling for a town hall meeting to address complaints from across the state about hostility and resentment. Another student, from a Covington middle school, said he was suspended for wearing an Obama shirt to school Nov. 5 after the principal told students not to wear political paraphernalia.

The student's mother, Eshe Riviears, said the principal told her: "Whether you like it or not, we're in the South, and there are a lot of people who are not happy with this decision."

Other incidents include:

_Four North Carolina State University students admitted writing anti-Obama comments in a tunnel designated for free speech expression, including one that said: "Let's shoot that (N-word) in the head." Obama has received more threats than any other president-elect, authorities say.

_At Standish, Maine, a sign inside the Oak Hill General Store read: "Osama Obama Shotgun Pool." Customers could sign up to bet $1 on a date when Obama would be killed. "Stabbing, shooting, roadside bombs, they all count," the sign said. At the bottom of the marker board was written "Let's hope someone wins."

_Racist graffiti was found in places including New York's Long Island, where two dozen cars were spray-painted; Kilgore, Texas, where the local high school and skate park were defaced; and the Los Angeles area, where swastikas, racial slurs and "Go Back To Africa" were spray painted on sidewalks, houses and cars.

_Second- and third-grade students on a school bus in Rexburg, Idaho, chanted "assassinate Obama," a district official said.

_University of Alabama professor Marsha L. Houston said a poster of the Obama family was ripped off her office door. A replacement poster was defaced with a death threat and a racial slur. "It seems the election brought the racist rats out of the woodwork," Houston said.

_Black figures were hanged by nooses from trees on Mount Desert Island, Maine, the Bangor Daily News reported. The president of Baylor University in Waco, Texas said a rope found hanging from a campus tree was apparently an abandoned swing and not a noose.

_Crosses were burned in yards of Obama supporters in Hardwick, N.J., and Apolacan Township, Pa.

_A black teenager in New York City said he was attacked with a bat on election night by four white men who shouted 'Obama.'

_In the Pittsburgh suburb of Forest Hills, a black man said he found a note with a racial slur on his car windshield, saying "now that you voted for Obama, just watch out for your house."

Emotions are often raw after a hard-fought political campaign, but now those on the losing side have an easy target for their anger.

"The principle is very simple," said BJ Gallagher, a sociologist and co-author of the diversity book "A Peacock in the Land of Penguins." "If I can't hurt the person I'm angry at, then I'll vent my anger on a substitute, i.e., someone of the same race."

"We saw the same thing happen after the 9-11 attacks, as a wave of anti-Muslim violence swept the country. We saw it happen after the Rodney King verdict, when Los Angeles blacks erupted in rage at the injustice perpetrated by 'the white man.'"

"It's as stupid and ineffectual as kicking your dog when you've had a bad day at the office," Gallagher said. "But it happens a lot."

Associated Press writers Errin Haines, Jerry Harkavy, Jay Reeves, Johnny Clark and researcher Rhonda Shafner contributed to this report.

Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Obama Cannot Be President

 
 By Dr. Robert B. Coambs  Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Dr. Coambs studies human reasoning and logic.

Obama is Disqualified by the Known Unknowns

(1) At the time of the November 4 election, Obama' eligibility was unknown to the majority of the American electorate.  That is, the vast majority of the American electorate did not know whether Obama was eligible to become the President of the United States (POTUS).

Furthermore Obama's eligibility remains unknown, even to Americans who are very interested in this question, and have inquired deeply into it.  When asked in court to produce evidence of his eligibility, Obama has declined to do so, even in the face of the considerable time, expense and trouble that is needed to avoid providing this evidence.  Thus, the US citizenry did not know on November 4 if Obama was eligible, and they still do not know. http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6254


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Fw: Dog Dance Video

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Friday, November 14, 2008

Obama and the Democrats

GOP Trust.com
Message from The National Republican Trust PAC
From Scott Wheeler


Save Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, Savage

Obama, Democrats Making Huge Assault on Georgia Race

Scott Wheeler
Executive Director



Dear Supporter:

I warned you a week ago that the Democrats were planning a massive national effort to take the Georgia Senate seat held by Republican Saxby Chambliss.

We now have proof. I will tell you about it a minute.

First, remember the Democrats have one goal: to get the 60 votes they need in the Senate which allows them to push through Obama's radical legislative agenda.

Their first target: talk radio. Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer has already called talk radio "pornography."

He and other Democrats like Nancy Pelosi want talk radio regulated by the FCC with a new "Fairness Doctrine."

Such a plan would end talk radio as we know it and crush Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Imus and others.

They want to abolish free talk radio because it will be much easier for Obama to push through Congress his radical plans to increase taxes, to make $1 trillion in new spending, cut the military, appoint hundreds of liberal judges and worse.

But they need 60 Senate votes to do it!

Right now the Democrats have 57 votes and are trying to get the Senate seats in Minnesota and Alaska. They also believe several liberal Republicans will crossover and back them.

But they will still need the Georgia Senate seat to get the 60 votes they need for sure.

That's why it is absolutely critical we stop them in Georgia and keep Republican Chambliss in the Senate.

You can help the National Republican Trust PAC do this — Go Here Now.

Obama Sending His Troops in Georgia

The Democrats believe they can win Georgia even though McCain won the state by a small margin.

Here's why. The December 2 run-off will have a small turnout.

The Democrats plan to use their massive organizational and money edge and get out key Democratic groups like African-American voters and union activists.

Here's what the Wall Street Journal reported today about the Georgia race:

"Democrats have sent their own pitches to Washington interest groups on behalf of [Democratic candidate] Mr. Martin. Officials from labor unions, abortion-rights organizations and other pro-Democratic groups are mapping out plans to try to flood the airwaves and put boots on the ground in the coming weeks.

"And the Obama campaign has sent roughly 100 of its national field organizers to help with the race."

This is just the beginning.

Don't forget that it was Obama's campaign that out-organized Hillary Clinton and won almost every Democratic caucus during the primary.

They will use similar techniques in Georgia.

This is why our work is so important.

We at the National Republican Trust are planning a multi-million dollar TV ad campaign to counter Obama and his backers.

We want to stop them in Georgia and end Obama's radical agenda in Congress.

We need your support to do it — Go Here Now.

Fox news analyst Dick Morris says, "The National Republican Trust is doing the job of the Republican party by fighting in Georgia."

He says we are now the most effective organization fighting for conservative values in the GOP and country today.

But we need your help to fight.

Already 40,000 Americans have donated to our cause.

We need you to join them — please do so by Going Here Now.

The maximum donation is $5000. It is a small amount when you consider how much you'll pay if Obama gets his way and increases your taxes, as he promises.

But even if you donate less, say $2500 or $1000 or even $500 — it will make a huge difference in our TV ad campaign.

We need your help — join us by Going Here Now.

Ronald Reagan once said, "If not us, who? If not now, when?"

This is our moment to keep America great.

Donate today by Going Here Now.

Thank you.

Yours for America,

Scott Wheeler
Executive Director

P.S. The election is just weeks away. The Democrats will pour more troops and money into Georgia. But most Georgians don't buy their liberal agenda. Our job is simple: we need to get out our voters! We can do it with your help — do so today without delay by calling our Donor Hotline at 1-866-957-1467 or Go Here Now.




Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Fw: I'm sending you some Autumn...

Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1735 - Release Date: 10/20/08 2:52 PM


 


 



 
Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Fw: Fwd: When engineers own a dog

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Add FUN to your email - CLICK HERE!
Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

This is cute


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices

Rush Limbaugh nailed this one

Love him or loathe him, he nailed this one right on the head..........

By Rush Limbaugh:

I think the vast differences in compensation between victims of the September 11 casualty and those who die serving our country in Uniform are profound. No one is really talking about it either, because you just don't criticize anything having to do with September 11. Well, I can't let the numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing about the entitlement mentality of this country. ! If you lost a family member in the September 11 attack, you're going to get an average of $1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way up to $4.7 million.
If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier killed in action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half of which is taxable.

Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you remarry. And there's a payment of $211 per month for each child under 18. When the child hits 18, those payments come to a screeching halt.

Keep in mind that some of the people who are getting an average of $1.185 million up to $4.7 milli on are complaining that it's not enough Their deaths were tragic, but for most, they were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harms way FOR ALL OF US, and they and their families know the dangers.

We also learned over the weekend that some of the v! ictims from the Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the same deal that the September 11 families are getting. In addition to that, some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for compensation a s well.

You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad. Every time a pay raise comes up for the military, they usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low-rent housing Make sense?

However, our own US Congress voted themselves a raise. Many of you! don't know that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month. And most are now equal to being millionaires plus. They do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system. If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7, they may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed them in harm's way receives a pension of $15,000 per month.

I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and daughters who are now

fighting.

" W! hen do we finally do something about this?" If this doesn't seem fair to you, it is time to forward this to as many people as you can.

How many people

CAN YOU

send this to?

****************************


Share/Save/Bookmark

allvoices
 
Add to Technorati Favorites